When Nexus receives well-thought out comments, we will move them to posts to give them maximum visibility. This comment came in today as a comment to our earlier post and we felt it deserved better visibility. Clearly the writer is a Ron Paul supporter. We have been hearing from a lot of those lately! We are just hours away from the Iowa results! Here is the comment:
An interesting post. A few things to consider…
1. The idea that Mitt Romney is a front-runner in Iowa is accurate to some extent, but only insofar as Ron Paul is also considered an equal front-runner in this particular state. Romney and Paul’s ground work in the state of Iowa has left the other candidates jealous, and until Fox News anointed Santorum the surging candidate two days before any polls indicated such (interesting huh?), he was considering dropping out with a last place finish in Iowa…yeah he was really expecting this!
2. Where is the journalistic integrity of Rupert Murdoch? This is the man who owns Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, and he doesn’t think its unfair to the democratic process for him to endorse a candidate for President of the United States? I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised by these actions, but I’m allowed to be outraged.
3. Rick Santorum’s surge was strategically placed for mere days before the caucuses because his record when vetted is going to be chewed up and spit out by fiscal conservatives faster than Gingrich after Ron Paul’s “serial hypocrisy” ad campaign. The mainstream media, in an effort to either sensationalize the caucus or to dilute the vote of the anti-Romney field (the former is more plausible), propped up Santorum’s poll numbers to justify increased face time on major network programs. All of this under the guise of an Iowan electorate that was “still making up their minds.” The ironic truth is that Iowans have heard from Santorum, more than any other candidate in fact, so the idea that he was polling in the low single digits because of lack of exposure is nonsense.
To the point about who the “right candidate” is to go up against Obama:
There are a lot of things to consider here, but I’ll give my take on a couple of things that I’ll be looking to play a role in the general election. First, the Republicans that voted for McCain in 08 will vote Republican in the ’12 election almost undoubtedly. The same cannot be said about the Obama supporters of ’08. This is a man who promised change, and had a devoted group of supporters that expected him to deliver and in lots of areas he let them down. The Republican candidate is going to need to capitalize on these disenfranchised Obama supporters by appealing to the independent population of America (the heavily majority of America, by the way). So who is the right candidate to vie for the independent vote? Well, statistically its Ron Paul and Mitt Romney, with Ron Paul with a pretty healthy advantage. I consider the right candidate to be someone who is going to be able to contrast with Obama on economic and monetary policy, as this is where the election will be framed around. Ron Paul, and Mitt Romney almost accidentally, endorse the economic and monetary policy of Austrian economics, an economic perspective vastly contrary to Obama’s Keynesian approach of stimulus market-steering and deficit spending. These two, whom I believe will be the Romney vs. anti-Romney after these first few caucuses and primaries take place, will have to frame the debate with Obama as “the government tried, now let the market have its chance!” It should be a very interesting election, and one that I believe sees Ron Paul as the “most right” candidate to take on Obama on issues that matter the most to the citizens of the United States.